CONTACT:
Dickson Frohlich
1200 E D St, Tacoma, WA 9842
Phone: (253) 358-8473
Email: reception@dicksonlegal.com
Website: Dickson Frohlich Law Firm

Thomas L. Dickson is an experienced litigator and the founding partner of the Dickson Frohlich. Since 1981, he’s helped clients prevail in their real estate, construction, and business law matters. Regardless of how complicated or challenging a client’s issue may be, he will assist in guiding that client to the best outcome. He is founding partner of the Dickson Frohlich, with offices in Tacoma and Seattle.

He is a contributing author to the real property chapter of the Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual published by the King’s County Bar Association. For the 2014 LexisNexis Practice Guide: Washington Real Estate Litigation, he serves as co-editor, content editor, and editorial consultant.

BAR ADMISSIONS:
  • Washington Bar 1981

EDUCATION:
  • J.D, California Western School of Law - 1981
  • B.A, Brigham Young University - 1977

WORK EXPERIENCE:
  • Dickson Frohlich (Founder) 1981 - Present

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS:
  • Tacoma Pierce County Bar Association (Member)
  • King County Bar Association (Member)
  • Washington State Bar Association (Member)

HONORS AND AWARDS:
  • Inducted into the Tacoma-Pierce County Sports Hall of Fame (Peirce County Sports Hall of Fame) 2008
  • Award of Appreciation for performing as Committee Chairman (Young Lawyers Practice Manual) 1989

PUBLICATIONS:
  • Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual (Shoreline Management Act, and Land Use Petition Act, Land Use and Environmental Law Chapter XXIII) 2014
  • LEXIS-NEXIS (Washington Real Estate Litigation Practice Guide) 2014
  • National Business Institute (Taking Property by Eminent Domain and Land Use Law, Washington Land Use: Current Issues in Subdivision, Eminent Domain, and Zoning Law) 2004
  • National Business Institute (The Land Subdivision Process, Washington Land Use: Current Issues in Subdivision, Annexation, and Zoning Law) 2003
  • Lorman Education Services publication (Construction Liens, Construction Litigation) 2002
  • Lorman Education Services (Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, Unclaimed Property Reporting in Washington) 2002
  • Institute for Paralegal Education (Taking the Land Use Case to Trial, Current Issues in Zoning and Land Use for Washington Paralegals) 2002
  • RCW 18.27 (Contractor's Registration) 1992
  • Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual (Zoning, Shoreline Management Act, and Land Use Petition Act, Land Use and Environmental Law) 1991
  • Seattle-King County Bar Association (Real Property Practice and Civil Trial Practice, Chapters of the Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual) 1989
  • Seattle-King County Bar Association (Real Property Practice and Civil Trial Practice, Chapters of the Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual) 1988
  • Seattle-King County Bar Association (Real Property Practice and Civil Trial Practice, Chapters of the Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual) 1987
  • Seattle-King County Bar Association (Real Property Practice and Civil Trial Practice, Chapters of the Washington Lawyer's Practice Manual) 1986

CONFERENCE:
  • National Business Institute (Taking Property by Eminent Domain and Land Use Law, Washington Land Use: Current Issues in Subdivision, Eminent Domain, and Zoning Law) 2004
  • National Business Institute (The Land Subdivision Process, Washington Land Use: Current Issues in Subdivision, Annexation, and Zoning Law) 2003
  • Lorman Education Services (Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, Unclaimed Property Reporting in Washington) 2002
  • Lorman Education Services (Construction Liens, Construction Litigation) 2002
  • CLE Lecture Series (Taking the Land Use Case to Trial, Current Issues in Zoning and Land Use for Washington Paralegals) 2002
  • Tacoma Pierce County Bar Association (Contractor's Registration, RCW 18.27) 1992

CONTACT:
(Tacoma Office)

Dickson Frohlich
1200 East D Street
Tacoma, WA 98421
Phone: (253) 358-8473



(Seattle Office)
Dickson Frohlich
2101 4th Avenue, Suite 1830
Seattle, WA 98121
Phone: 206-429-4418




















by Thomas L. Dickson, Esq.

Construction liens are an important part of Seattle real estate law and other high-growth areas of Western Washington. The lien, also called a “mechanic’s lien,” represents a pre-judicial claim against title, and the owner of the land on whom the lien is recorded cannot sell the property or obtain a loan thereon until the lien is satisfied, removed, or otherwise accommodated.

The Effect of a Construction Lien. Under RCW 60.04.021, “any person furnishing labor, professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of real property shall have a lien upon the improvement for the contract price of labor, professional services, materials, or equipment furnished at the instance of the owner, or the agent or construction agent of the owner.” Effectively, a lien is a written notice recorded on the targeted property in the county auditor’s or recorder’s office and represents an encumbrance on title even though no lawsuit is filed.

Seattle real estate attorneys confront a regular occurrence of construction liens because of the tremendous growth in Seattle and Bellevue. Most are likely legitimate, but a great number are not. Construction companies may record them to leverage an unjustified payment out of a pending closing or to temper an angered developer seeking to sue the contractor for substandard work. Before, however, a contractor or construction company is eligible to record a construction lien or mechanic’s lien, it must be a registered contractor with the state. Under RCW 60.04.011(11), a “potential lien claimant” must be “registered or licensed if required to be licensed or registered by the provisions of the laws of the State of Washington.”

Mandatory Contractor’s Registration. Under RCW 18.27.020(1), registration is mandatory through the Department of Labor and Industries, requiring the posting of a surety bond and procuring insurance. The purpose of contractors’ registration is to protect consumers from irresponsible contractors, “to prevent the victimizing of a ‘defenseless’ public.” Northwest Cascade Construction Co. v. Custom Component Structures, Inc., 83 Wn.2d 453, 459-60, 519 P. 2d 1 (1974). See also B.A. Van de Grift, Inc. v. Skagit County, 59 Wn. App. 545, 800 P.2d 375 (1990).

A suit for unjust enrichment will not suffice for a lack of registration. The court in Vedder v. Spellman, 78 Wn.2d 834, 480 P.2d 207 (1971) denied non-registered contractor’s damages notwithstanding the plaintiff’s masterful job and a great investment of time. There is no relief for a contractor who unwittingly performs without valid registration regardless of great loss to him or her and unjust enrichment to the customer. Stewart v. Hammond, 78 Wn.2d 216, 471 P.2d 90 (1971).

Penalties for Lack of Registration. There are severe penalties for companies performing work without registration. For example, it is a gross misdemeanor for any contractor to “advertise, offer to do work, submit a bid, or perform any work as a contractor without being registered as required by this chapter.” RCW 18.27.020(1)(2)(a). This applies even if a contractor’s previous registration is suspended or revoked; or if a licensed contractor hires an unregistered subcontractor or allows another entity to falsely use its registration. RCW 18.27.020(2)(d) and (e). It gets worse:

A person is guilty of a separate gross misdemeanor for each day worked if, after the person receives a citation from the department, the person works while unregistered, or while his or her registration is suspended or revoked, or works under a registration issued to another contractor. A person is guilty of a separate gross misdemeanor for each worksite on which he or she violates subsection (2) of this section. RCW 18.27.020(5).

Labor and Industries is serious; it mandates a two-year audit and monitoring program for offending parties after reinstatement with notices to the Departments of Revenue and Employment Security to assist in scrutinizing whether “any taxes or registration, license, or other fees or penalties are owed the state.” RCW 18.27.020(6).

Consumer Protection Violation. Making matters even more critical for the contractor is a violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act for lack of registration. Under RCW 18.27.350, noncompliance with the Contractor’s Registration Statute may violate the Unfair Business Practices-Consumer Protection Act.

“The fact that a contractor is found to have committed a misdemeanor or infraction under this chapter shall be deemed to affect the public interest and shall constitute a violation of chapter 19.86 RCW,” enabling the plaintiff to “recover the actual damages sustained by him or her, or both, together with the costs of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.” The court at its discretion can treble the plaintiff’s damages up to a limit of $25,000. RCW 19.86.090.

Importance to Landowners and Developers. Aside from the obvious reasons, i.e., unregistered persons are likely less competent contractors or business people, it is critically important for landowners, developers, and real estate professionals to verify registrationbecause without it, no contractor may record a lien. That means even with a dispute, no lien gets in the way of a sale of property, obtaining title insurance or obtaining a loan secured by the land. When, thus, any lien is threatened or recorded, the effective property owner ordeveloper looks first to verify the contractor’s registration.

Where to Verify a Contractor’s Registration. Washington’s Department of Labor & Industries provides a verification service for the public to investigate the registration status of a contractor or business. The following link, https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/, asks the user to conduct a search by name, contractor’s license or UBI number.

A page is displayed showing the contractor’s full name, principals (sole proprietor, corporation or limited liability company), governing persons, UBI number, whether it is registered, expiration date of the license, name of the bonding company (for use in filing suit against the contractor), name of insurance company and policy number, Labor & Industries tax debts, if any, license violations during the six years previous, existing lawsuits against the bond, and more. If the contractor is not registered, no construction lien may be recorded, RCW 60.04.011(11), and the owner or developer may sue for removal of the wrongful lien.

At the Dickson Frohlich, we understand how important family law issues are and we approach every family-related case with compassion and personalized attention. Our Tacoma family law attorneys work to find solutions that help to preserve your family relationships and your financial situation. While any legal issue can be stressful, cases involving your spouse, children, or other family members can be particularly personal and sensitive. Family law cases have their own rules, requirements, and procedures and you always want to have an attorney on your side who is thoroughly familiar with family law claims in Tacoma. At the Dickson Frohlich, we regularly handle a variety of family law cases, including: divorce, military divorce, division of marital property and assets, real estate disputes in divorce, and child custody. Please contact our office for a free consultation or through our online contact form.

CONTACT:
Dickson Frohlich
1200 E D St, Tacoma, WA 98421
Phone: (253) 358-8473
Email: reception@dicksonlegal.com